'Lab Report Analysis\r'

'Memorandum TO: Emma Mackenzie, Writing instructor; Montana tech FROM: Sarah Hambidge, Montana Tech Student DATE: 6 November 2012 capacity: Lab Report Analysis This memo proposes the observations and claims I collected from reviewing trey contrastive research runing groundoratory promulgates. Three fields of strike be composed inside this memo that includes galvanising Engineering, environmental Engineering, and Petroleum Engineering. â€Å" galvanising Filters,” ( galvanizing), written by Joe Schmoe, is a research research science research research testing groundoratoryoratoryoratory address made by a student at a university.The College display panel produced an environmental science research science science testing groundoratoryoratoryoratory give by named, â€Å" observe short letter Quality,” ( bloodline), for the affair of student training as a research lab template. supervise Air Quality was written by Dr. Angela C. Morrow who graduated from the University of Northern Colorado. Within the aught Engineering field, I put, â€Å"NETL Extreme drill Lab Studies high temperature drilling Phenomena. ” (NETL). This lab was created by the U. S. Department of Energy and was found in the work of the U. S. Government. This lab authorship was written by K.David Lyons, Simone Honeygan, and Thomas Mroz. all three lab physical compositions’ features sport been comp atomic number 18d and contrasted utilize analytical techniques in this memo. Observation of undivided Document All three documents are close in footing of distance of paper. They are in the range among 6 and 9 pages long. The NETL drill richly Pressure high gear Temperature boring Phenomena and galvanising Filters lab deals have 4 or 5 figures to represent the purpose of the lab wrap up. The Air Quality lab to a greater extentover has one figure, a picture of a tree.College scorecard’s Monitoring Air Quality figures w ere denominate underneath the pictures in regular pillowcase. The rock rock oil lab stem used bold lettering underneath the figures. The electrical report’s figures were labeled with italics underneath the picture as fountainhead. * carve up styles All three labs differ potently when it comes to the style of how the separates were written. Drilling lab reports within Petroleum Engineering are roughly(prenominal) elaborate and long. The petroleum lab report has 3 paragraphs in the Abstract component while the early(a) cardinal reports have one short paragraph.The Petroleum lab includes specific numerical details much(prenominal) as contrastive foresights, fluid pressures, and temperatures. The other reports did non include quantities inside the origin paragraph that is why Drilling labs are more(prenominal) elaborate and precise when it comes to representing in initializeion. As a commentator is tuition the NETL Drilling Lab, they could be more confused than realizeing the other two labs. The quantities are not explained how they are derived truly well, so this could termination in a perception puzzle for a basic reader.I call in this would consecrate a reader with basic comprehension levels frustrated. * Headings According to the example lab report(Doyoyo,2002), paragraph titles should honour this formatting in crop of title page, Abstract, Experimental Procedure, Results, Discussion, proof, Appendices, and References. The lab report composed by the College Board follows this format most concisely. The College Boards paragraphs are titled Abstract, Objectives, Introduction, Materials, Procedure, info/Observations, Analysis, and Additional Resources.The functioning in this report is quite long because it has 3 pigboat headings within it that precede three distinguishable subjects. The analysis goes quite in prescience as well and has 2 different parts in it. The electrical lab report follows a similar paragraph loc alize; Objective, Background, Experiment, Results, Conclusion, and References. The background knowledge paragraph is 2 pages long; this is longer than any of the other documents. I believe in order to completely comprehend this document, you would have to shaft a great deal of background and have expierence in this field.The petroleum drilling lab report in like manner follows a different format; Abstract, Introduction, Acknowledgments, and References. TheNETL Drilling lab stands out from the rest of the labs too because amidst the introduction and acknowledgments, there are 4 paragraphs that explain descriptions, efforts, and forthcoming plans. This lab is farthermost from following the standard lab report format. The NETL Drilling Lab was written by the government so they may follow a stricter lab format than they tutor in schools. They might make up their own order of headings and paragraphs because they are on top of the chain. Font choice The NETL lab Report uses ten poi nt font in propagation New Roman. The galvanizing Engineering lab Report uses Times New Roman as well save its double spaced and typed in twelve point font. The environmental lab uses Calibri with twelve point font and quintuple spaces between every paragraph. The NETL lab is the most original looking lab because it looks dinner dress and fits more randomness within a page than the other labs. A reader could get the most information out of the NETL lab because it is constructed elaborately but also concisely. Overall tone The NETL lab has by far, most ball tone of voice. The lab created by the College Board is built for chiefly educational purposes; therefore it uses a smaller vocabulary for easier understanding. The Electrical lab report was made by students so it’s not that complex. The NETL lab is professional because it is a work of the government. This lab uses many magnanimous words, acronyms, references within text, and many numerical conversions. The lab wr itten by students has the least(prenominal) escaped tone, most likely because they are least educated.Reading the Electrical Filters Lab could leave a reader lost in some places, and readers may want to read a different lab on Electrical Filters written by a cook or someone with a professional degree. * Repetition The College Board lab report uses repititon the most because it was created by doctors and doctors are very precise with representing information. It often repeats, â€Å"Please tell AP’s licensing for AP Questions and Materials. ” It also repeats, â€Å"Clean Air Act,” â€Å"NAAQS,” â€Å"gypsum,” and â€Å"air quality laws. ” Within the procedure the paragraphs are repetitive as well.The Electrical lab is the least repetitive but it did repeat input and output channelise values. The petroleum lab repeats drilling terms and the process of deep drilling. I think the repetition in all of the labs was necessity because a basic reader would need to be reminded of the information to smoothly issue through rendering the documents. Sections The pieces within the 3 lab reports differ in body. any(prenominal) are more like Markel’s sample(Markel,2010) than others. * Abstract The petroleum lab and environmental reflect the study focus of the lab well.The lineation concisely communicates the purpose of the lab, the approach, the results, and the significances of the findings. The electrical lab doesn’t have an abstract but sometimes instructors do not require an abstract section. The environmental lab does a better job at writing the abstract because it’s shorter and more direct to the point, therefore easier to understand. * Introduction The petroleum lab does the worst at the introduction. Markel (Markel, 2010, ch10), says the purpose of the lab is clearly stated. The petroleum lab is sort of confusing.It says,” The purpose of this paper and intentness projects [1-5] deep well s are specify as wells drilled for oil and gas having true vertical depth (TVD) greater than 15,000 feet (4572 meters. )” The electrical report is more to the point, for example, â€Å"The objective of this lab is to build and test a first order, low-pass filter with resistors and capacitors. ” The Environmental lab’s purpose education is, â€Å"At the end of this lab, you will be able to describe and discuss several(prenominal) air pollutants and methods for detecting them. The environmental lab is a lab template so it is written in a future tense format rather than quondam(prenominal) tense like the other labs. Conclusion In reading this memo, I hope you understand my findings an key points about the three lab reports I analyzed. Electrical Filters, by Joe Schomoe, was poorly written compared to the other lab reports. It did properly use its figures and the abstract section was written correctly. This document was hard to read because the background was ve ry long and in depth. This document also was least challenge to the eye because the lack of professionalism.College Board’s Monitoring Air Quality boilers suit did well as serving the major purpose as a lab template for students. However this lab take more figures and pictures because it only has one figure. The College Board also followed Markel’s lab format the closest. The repetition used by this lab made the whole document work more as reading. The NETL Extreme Drilling Laboratory Studies High Pressure High Temperature Drilling Phenomena, is the most professional and formal written document compared to the other two labs.It did not follow the normal lab report format, but it contained many subservient figures and tables. This lab can be confusing because it is so complex, but most information and data can be obtained from reading this lab report. References * Doyoyo, September 19, 2002, 13. 014J/1. 052J â€Å"Helpful operating instructions on how to write a chemical mechanism lab report. ” * Markel, 2010 Chapters 6,7,9,10,18, Appendix B related to APA documentation * Unit 3 Topics Checklist * (Electrical)\r\n'